<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<opml version="2.0">
<head>
<title>14.opml</title>
<dateCreated>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:15:52 GMT</dateCreated>
<dateModified>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:54:15 GMT</dateModified>
<ownerName>Tom Morris</ownerName>
</head>
<body><outline text="Christian Voice professional rhetoric bandit and shit-for-brains Stephen Green has had &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=967&quot;&gt;a run in with Ian Watkins from Steps&lt;/a&gt;. Nice chap that Green is, he compares being gay with being a serial killer." created="Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:54:15 GMT"/><outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://webkit.org/blog/158/the-acid-3-test/&quot;&gt;Dave Hyatt&lt;/a&gt; reports that WebKit (the open source rendering code underlying Safari) is now getting 90/100 on &lt;a href=&quot;http://acid3.acidtests.org&quot;&gt;Acid 3&lt;/a&gt;. Firefox 2 is still my daily browser (AdBlock, Firebug, del.icio.us and It's All Text! are the reasons), but I'm a huge fan of WebKit." created="Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:24:35 GMT"/><outline text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/notesarchive.php?id=2236&quot;&gt;Ophelia Benson&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;q&gt;They teach, in universities; their subject is an academic discipline; yet they feel quite cheerful about using words that mean everything and nothing, and they make a virtue of vagueness. And not only are they academics, they are feminist academics. Fucking hell. How did academic feminism get turned into Advanced Wool-gathering? Why do feminists think it's feminist to make a parade of refusing to think?&lt;/q&gt;" created="Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:15:52 GMT"/>
</body>
</opml>
